=====

IN THIS EDITION:  Is a woman a "slut" just because she likes sex?
More importantly, are there women out there who like sex, but who
aren't "slutty"? 
 
=====



WHY ARE MEN DOING THIS INSTEAD OF TAKING TESTOSTERONE?


Sid was at the age when T levels drop. As much as 1% per year if
you are over 40.

Sid found he tired easily. Had low motivation.

And lots of fat around his belly.

But worst of all, his performance as a man had really fallen off
a cliff.

The chemicals his doc gave him didn't help much. No wonder.

Sid found out that his estrogen levels were higher than his
wife's!

And Sid's estrogen levels being higher than a woman the same
age (which is actually common with men these days).

Sid's doc gave him some "T supplements".

But Sid found that these caused problems for him.  The pills caused
his body to produce way to many red blood cells.

So he had to cut back on the Testosterone, which was a big problem.

His he was also a Type-2 Diabetic and had high blood pressure issues,
he had to take medication for both of theose which made the problem
worse.

But Sid watched this video, where the guy has helped over 11,292
men to REWIND their testosterone levels to what they were 20 years
ago.



http://www.scotrecommends.com/rewind
 


It helped EVERYTHING. It turned things completely around for Sid.

But the video is going down due to incredible pressures from the Big
Pharma lobbies that want men to take their expensive chemicals.

Go here now and watch while you still can (but beware, this is very
explicit):



http://www.scotrecommends.com/rewind



=====



SLUTTY PSYCHOLOGY


Have you ever heard the saying, "There are women you have sex with,
and women you marry"?

Sure you have.  And the underlying connotation there is that some
women are really do enjoy sex, but they really aren't "long-term
relationship material".

Meanwhile, the unfortunate (and erroneous) conclusion that many
guys make from there is that there are, in fact, OTHER women who'd
make great WIVES, but they're probably about as frigid as a meat
locker.

My educated guess is that this mindset is what gave rise to the
whole concept of "sluttiness".

It all started, most likely, as a way of differentiating
"short-term" women from the "long-term" ones.

It has always been a derogatory term, and most girls have never
really aspired to be "sluts".

But nowadays the word "slut" really has further devolved in the
minds of most men to connote more of an overarching attitude that
transcends mere sexual openness.
 
For better or worse, most of us know it when we see it, even if
some of us can't really put a finger on an objective definition of
what it really is. 
 
My best shot at defining "sluttiness" would be as follows:  An
attitude that focuses more on flaunting the potential for engaging
in physical sex acts than on showcasing complete, holistic
femininity.

Others might broaden the spectrum to include any indication on the
part of a woman that she'll "have sex with anything that walks".
 
As such, a "slut" apparently is willing to cheapen herself to the
point of being valued only as a "sex toy" for men.  

She therefore sells herself short in terms of other feminine gifts
--or even non-gender specific gifts--she might have.

This occurs (to men and women alike, for what it's worth) as a
blatant lack of self-respect, which in turn breeds disrespect
toward her on the part of others.
 
Therein lies the inherent problem with the term itself. 

"Slutty" women generally succeed at creating sexual desire in men
while simultaneously causing us to be (at best) indifferent--if not
flatly repulsed--by everything else they represent.
 
I think the typical social pattern of "sluttiness" as it often plays
out in the real world would corroborate that definition, at least
at the basic level.  A whole book could be written on "the
psychology of 'sluttiness'", no doubt.
 
Meanwhile, a woman who celebrates herself as more of a holistic
"feminine presence", if you will, can typically inspire IMMENSE
sexual desire while maintaining total self-respect. 

Amazing, isn't it?
 
The additional layer of wisdom such a woman has with regard to what
REALLY triggers a healthier level of male admiration tends to pay
HUGE dividends in terms of how much she is respected and
appreciated by the kind of guy she'd be happy with long-term.

And THAT'S what causes a woman to seem like "marriage material" to
us, right?
 
Importantly, there can be a significant amount of "grey area" with
regard to just how "slutty" a woman is relative to her "long-term
potential" factor.  Most women are neither 100% "slut" or 100%
"Sandra Dee-approved wife material".
 
Welcome to a key reason behind why some women can date a guy for,
say, two years with only empty promises of getting engaged anytime
soon.  

Elsewhere, there's another woman who can't get past the third date
with any guy before he show's up at her door with a little box of
"bling" from "Jared". 
 
It's all about sexual desire relative to how much the guy respects
her. 

Respect is logically followed by trust, of course.  So the
"sluttier" a woman seems, the less a guys sees "long-term
potential" there. 

Interestingly, it's almost invariably women who are "nice" for the
most part but who have a bit of a "slutty" streak who find
themselves dating "commitment-phobes".  

Unfortunately, this "grey area" is often completely misunderstood
by both men AND women...if they have the wherewithal to acknowledge
it at all.

Maybe you can relate to that, having been in a relationship with
such a woman in the past who inspired kind of a "civil war" in your
mind as to whether you REALLY felt comfortable marrying her or not.
 
Similarly, after a couple in such a position breaks up, the woman
may be utterly confused by the fact that the same guy might get
engaged to his next girlfriend within a matter of months or even
weeks, even though they had dated so long with no movement toward
marriage.
 
But now--surprise--I'm going to drop a BOMB on this whole
conversation.

Here goes...ready?

As it turns out, that lack of "sluttiness" as an attitude per se
often has ZERO correlation to a woman's potential enjoyment of
sex...even lots of it. 

Your future wife can be COMPLETELY respectable and COMPLETELY horny
and adventurous.  It's just that she's not so PUBLIC about her
sexuality.
 
Unfortunately, this is something that a LOT of guys who don't have
much experience with high-quality women fail to comprehend--hence
the widely-held belief that dating strippers or hiring prostitutes
is the way to go if they want to actually have good sex. 

For them "slut" = "sex" which is, of course, a belief that comes at the
expense of a whole host of other, incredibly satisfying feminine
gifts.

That's a tragic point of view to hold...and one that reeks
"inexperience" to both high-quality women AND the men who are truly
effective with them.
 
As far as I know, no suitable word exists to describe such a woman
who is both sexual AND respectable...but there should be.

I wish "vixen" worked, but there's a definition of that word that
connotes more of a "female dog" than a "female fox", if you get my
drift.  Perhaps "siren" would be better.

As a final note, you may see a movement afoot on the Internets to
to "reclaim" the word "slut" and give it a more positive
connotation.

The problem with that is that the very word itself follows the
classic phonetic pattern of derogatory/pejorative terms in the
English language (e.g single-syllable, harsh consonants, etc.). 

That's also a key reason why the "F word" will never carry the same
meaning as "lovemaking".
 
All of that said, there is and will ALWAYS be a place for role
playing "sluttiness" (and the "F word", for that matter) even
between couples with a healthy mutual-respect...go figure.
 

Be Good,

Scot McKay




=====




(c) X & Y Communications LLC, 2013.  All Rights Reserved.


This e-mail newsletter is a free service of X & Y Communications.
It is never sent to those who have not asked for it.  If you
believe you have been sent this message in error, please respond
and we will kindly (and promptly) remove you from our mailing list.